| A
Moroccan Cinema of Proximity
Beyond
Casablanca : M.A. Tazi and the Adventure of Moroccan Cinema
By Kevin Dwyer
Indiana University Press, 2004, 433 pp.
By
Pamela Nice
Anyone interested
in third world cinema, Moroccan film or M.A. Tazi’s
career will find anthropologists Kevin Dwyer’s new book
not only engaging but highly informative. Dwyer’s extended
interview with renowned Moroccan filmmaker Muhammad Abderrahman
Tazi is put in the context of Morocco’s recent cultural
history. Four of Tazi’s feature films are analyzed for
their themes and narrative structures, illustrated with stills
from the productions. The book skillfully weaves together
this analysis with Tazi’s experience producing the films;
and through this process, we are given a personalized history
of the economic and institutional development of Moroccan
national cinema.
Dwyer chose Tazi
as the focus of his study because Tazi’s film, “Looking
for My Wife’s Husband,” was the most popular film
of the mid-1990s, a time when the Moroccan public’s
interest in national films reached a turning point. Since
that time, the audience for Moroccan films has increased to
the extent that, in 2002, the annual theatre attendance at
Moroccan films was 7.6 percent, even though Moroccan films
constituted only 2 percent of total films shown.
Tazi also serves as a paradigmatic model of the Moroccan filmmaker,
since his career so closely follows the development of Moroccan
cinema since independence in 1956. Though he has made only
five feature films over 25 years, this makes him highly prolific
among his peers. Like many of his and the younger generation
of Moroccan filmmakers, he trained outside of Morocco, in
Europe and the U.S., developing his skills on foreign films
produced in Morocco; has experimented with European co-production;
and believes that Moroccan film should be one of “proximity”
– using stories from Moroccan culture, with a narrative
style and humor particular to that culture. In addition, Tazi’s
films have won several international awards, and he has risen
to a position of prominence in Morocco, including a stint
as director of film production for 2M, the second Moroccan
television
station.
The chapters on
the films raise particularly interesting issues, especially
from Dwyer’s anthropological perspective. In the film
“Badis,” filmed in the actual town of Badis in
Morocco, Tazi tells the story of two women oppressed by village
life who rebel against their treatment, and in the end of
the film are punished by the villagers with a fatal stoning.
As in many Moroccan films, townspeople played the roles of
extras, and Tazi made concerted attempts to involve them in
the filmmaking process, which included inviting them to a
private screening before the opening. Not surprisingly, when
some of the townspeople viewed the film, they were upset,
because they felt their community’s privacy had been
violated. Dwyer discusses with Tazi why he chose to keep the
real name of the town in his film, which would inevitably
raise the “anthropological problem of how to ‘represent’
living human communities.”
| ...he [Tazi] also sees the downside
of the increasing presence of American filmmaking in Morocco:
not only do these productions leech away technical expertise
needed on indigenous films, but they encourage locals
to charge Moroccan productions the same fees for location
shooting that the Americans pay. |
Dwyer also concentrates on Tazi’s depiction of women’s
issues in his films, his recurring theme of clandestine emigration,
a growing problem in economically-challenged Morocco, his
attitude toward censorship and cultural standards of decency,
and Tazi’s views on the self-Orientalizing of his culture.
It becomes evident early on that Tazi’s metaphor of
the Moroccan filmmaker as bumblebee seems particularly apt:
“...according to the laws of aeronautics, it’s
impossible for that insect to fly. But bumblebees fly just
the same! That’s the way it is for our cinema...we
can’t make films but, just the same, we make films!”
A Moroccan film typically takes 3-4 years to make. Though
the state funds films through the Aid Fund, Dwyer points out
that “of the approximately 120 feature film proposals
submitted to the Aid Fund between 1998 and 1999, about 50
were accepted . . . . The sums offered were between one million
and three and a half million dirhams, usually amounting to
less than half the film’s budget.” The director
is largely responsible for acquiring the additional funds
necessary, so he spends much time on this non-artistic activity.
Filming often takes place on location, in communities naive
to the filmmaking process, which can increase inefficiency.
There are additional challenges faced by Moroccan filmmakers
within the global context: “exhibition and distribution
. . . are in private hands, . . . [D]istributors prefer, on
purely economic grounds, to promote cheaper imports rather
than national films costing more to rent, and . . . consequently,
national films are rarely profitable and funds for production
must therefore come from other than commercial capital investment.”
Globalization and free trade agreements have conspired to
keep national cinemas of the third world, in particular, in
a precarious situation, since both favor large-scale metropolitan
producers.
And though Tazi clearly has benefited from working on foreign
productions in Morocco, gaining technical expertise and refining
his cinematographic skill, he also sees the down side of the
increasing presence of American filmmaking in Morocco: not
only do these productions leech away technical expertise needed
on indigenous films, but they encourage locals to charge Moroccan
productions the same fees for location shooting that the Americans
pay.
In spite of these challenges, Dwyer has a positive perspective
on the creativity and perseverance of Morocco’s filmmakers.
In his final chapter, he also offers suggestions for ongoing
development of Morocco’s film sector: continued co-production
with television stations; a clear policy on distribution and
exhibition of Moroccan films in the national theatres; the
development of the producer’s role; attention to copyright
issues for filmmakers; and increased funding by the Aid Fund.
A desirable goal would be the production of 10 films per year
in the near future.
Dwyer’s book has a very helpful notes section, offering
political, social and historical context for Moroccan cinema;
a detailed table of contents, that allows readers to pick
their topics of interest; and a comparative chronology, tying
together Tazi’s life and career with developments in
Moroccan cinema and culture and with political developments
in the Maghreb. This clearly written book, which so skillfully
sets a Moroccan filmmaker’s career in the context of
his culture and his art, could serve as a text for film and/or
anthropology courses, in addition to entertaining the general
reading public.
This essay appears in Al Jadid, Vol. 10, no. 49
Copyright (c) 2004 by Al Jadid
|