| Remembering
Latifa al-Zayyat By
Amal Amireh
Arab
cultural circles have recently mourned the loss of the prominent
Egyptian intellectual Latifa al-Zayyat, who died of cancer
in Cairo on September 10, 1996 . She was 73 years old. Her
death came soon after she had received Egypt ’s highest State
Prize for literature. While the state’s acknowledgment of
her achievements was long overdue, al-Zayyat had much popular
and collegial support throughout her often difficult life-journey.
This
journey began on August 8, 1923. Born in Dumyat, Egypt to
an established middle-class family, al-Zayyat benefited from
her class’ interest in educating women. Between 1942 and 1946
she attended Cairo University , where she also received a
Ph.D. in English literature in 1957. She then became a professor
of English in the women’s college there and was the head of
the English department between 1976-1983.
Al-Zayyat
came of age as a woman, artist, and intellectual through living
some of the most defining moments in her country’s modern
history. She was shaped by events and she helped shape events,
emerging in the process as a new model for Arab womanhood.
A
Moment of Transformation
In
1934, an 11-year old girl stood on the balcony of her Al-Mansoura
house looking at the street below. A battle was raging: on
one side were fellow Egyptians protesting the British presence
in their country and a corrupt palace complicit with imperial
powers, on the other was the armed police. Open-eyed, the
girl watched, and 60 years later, al-Zayyat described how
she felt on that blood-stained day: “I trembled with feelings
of powerlessness, of misery, of oppression, as the bullets
of the police killed fourteen demonstrators that day. I screamed
for my inability to act, I screamed for my inability to go
down to the street to stop the bullets from coming out of
the black guns. I shed the child in me and the young woman
came of age — prematurely — for I encountered knowledge that
went beyond the home to include all of the homeland. My future
fate was decided at that moment...”
Not long after, as
a secondary school-student, al-Zayyat took to the streets
herself, joining in the anti-British demonstrations. Her political
activities would only intensify with time. As an undergraduate
at Cairo University, she became involved with leftist groups
on campus and in 1946 was elected secretary of The Students’
and Workers’ National Committee, which led Egypt ’s independence
struggle during that period. The fact that the students and
workers should choose a young woman to lead them attests both
to the progressive nature of the national movement at the
time and to the remarkable abilities of al-Zayyat herself.
This
early involvement in the national struggle affected al-Zayyat
deeply and transformed the polite middle-class woman into
a fighter. In al-Zayyat’s words, “It was during those years
that the timid girl, who had carried her plump body as if
it were a sin, developed into a group leader: daring, confronting,
arguing, making rapid decisions, and thriving with pride in
her abilities.”
And
for preferring the fiery speeches of the barricade to the
polite conversations of the living room, al-Zayyat paid a
price. She was imprisoned twice at the age of 26 and received
a three year suspended jail sentence. But it was worth it.
For her early political experience enabled her to form a sense
of self that would guide her throughout the rest of her life.
She discovered that through activist work, “the personal self
dissolved only to be enriched by the collective one.” Al-Zayyat
described the effects of this dynamic relation between the
individual and the group: “I was rendered an active responsible
human being, open to my country and my people, and preoccupied
with their concerns.” She insisted that “paradoxically, one
can only find one’s self by initially losing it into a much
wider issue than one’s own subjectivity, into a reality bigger
than one’s own.”
By
developing a self that was, in her words, “liberated from
the prisonhouse of the self,” al-Zayyat attempted to balance
the personal and the political, the individual and the group.
In fighting against the British, she was also rebelling “against
the authority which charges all the psychological and mental
faculties of the human being.” Al-Zayyat continued throughout
her life to believe in the intertwining of the private sphere
and the public sphere, and always resisted considering one
in isolation from the other.
The
Open Door to a Glorious Future
"Al-Bab
al-Maftooh" (The Open Door , 1960), al-Zayyat’s
first (and for a long time only) novel, deals with the multiple
layers of experience. While not strictly autobiographical,
the author revisits her university days and creates a heroine
after her own heart. The novel tells the story of Layla, a
young woman from the Cairean middle class. Layla’s psychological,
social, and political growth takes place in the context of
the years from 1946 to 1956 — years that witnessed the revolt
against the British and the Palace, the Free Officer’s Revolution
of 1952, Jamal Abdul Nasser’s nationalization of the Suez
Canal, and the Israeli-British-French attack that followed.
Layla’s
personal travails begin when she menstruates for the first
time, an event which brings tears of humiliation and distress
to her father’s eyes. Determined to guard his honor against
any future stains, he restricts his daughter’s movement and
arranges for her to marry her cousin.
For
al-Zayyat, the father represents not only an older generation
unable to cope with the realities of life, but also a rotten
middle class with no future vision to guide the country. Layla,
however, is the New Woman who, thanks to the education her
class gave her, developed a different sense of self from the
one prescribed by her conservative upbringing. One of the
women characters describes her generation’s dilemma this way:
“Our mothers knew their situation, whereas we are lost. We
do not know if we are in a harem or not, or whether love is
forbidden or allowed. Our parents say its forbidden, yet the
government-run radio sings day and night about love. Books
tell women they are free, and yet if a woman really believes
that, a catastrophe will happen and her reputation will be
blackened.”
Layla begins to feel
empowered when she takes part in anti-British demonstrations:
“She was fused in a whole, pushing her forward, embracing
her and protecting her. She shouted anew in a voice different
from hers, a voice which unified her being with a collective
one.” Eventually, she becomes a school teacher in Port Said.
When the Suez Canal war occurs in 1956 she participates and
gains the courage that allows her to break up with her conventional
fiancee and attach herself to a revolutionary colleague.
"The
Open Door" is a pioneering work on many levels. According
to the critic Farida al-Naqash it “was an expression of a
new wave in the Arabic novel, one that combines poetic realism
with committed literature.” In probing the relationship between
nationalism and feminism — in showing their interdependence
— al-Zayyat dealt with a complex issue that is still a hot
topic of debate among Arab feminists. The novel expresses
the optimism of the post-revolutionary period, when a young
generation of Egyptian men and women looked forward to a hopeful
future.
The
same novel is now “an impossibility,” al-Zayyat said a few
years ago. When she wrote it she shared with her audience
a common language and a common vision. But things have changed.
According to her, “roads to salvation are blocked; the common
ground of shared values seem to break down into multiple different
sets of values according to the varied social strata; the
common sensibility and its language is no more; people lacking
national unity are divided and subdivided until each is turned
into an insular island.” One Egyptian critic recently wrote
that his female students don’t see themselves in the heroine
of "The Open Door. They no longer believe that
what Layla achieves by the end of the book is possible for
them.
"The
Open Door" was simultaneously a product of
its time and ahead of it. This is perhaps why the cinematic
version of the novel, directed by Henry Barakat and starring
Fatin Hamama and Mahmoud Mursy, was a commercial failure when
it was first released in 1962. Barakat attributes this failure
to the audience’s opposition to the theme of women’s liberation
(even though the film alters the ending by showing that the
change in the heroine is brought about by the man with whom
she falls in love). But the film is well-received now whenever
it is shown on Egyptian television, which probably reflects
the audience’s nostalgia for the by-gone time of high revolutionary
tide.
Setbacks
Ironically,
al-Zayyat wrote her most optimistic book at a very difficult
period in her life, as if she were turning to the past for
help. During her thirteen-year unhappy marriage to Dr. Rashad
Rushdi, a right-wing critic with ideological and political
views diametrically opposed to hers, she wrote little and
left political work altogether.
In
her autobiography, "Hamlat Tafteesh: Awraq Shakhseyyah"
(Search Operation: Personal Papers, 1992) she dissects
herself with brutal honesty, describing her condition as one
of “paralysis,” in which she lost her ability to act. Such
a state, she believes, was brought about by her desperate
search for personal happiness, which led her to merge herself
with her husband. But al-Zayyat discovers that happiness sought
at the expense of the integrity and autonomy of the self is
“illusionary happiness.” “I realize now,” she wrote in 1992,
“that my love was a loss in the other and that this is an
unforgivable crime because I was the one who committed it.
For there is no worse crime than burying one’s self alive.
My hands are stained with my own blood.” The marriage ended
in 1965 with a painfully public divorce.
After
the divorce, al-Zayyat resumed her suspended activities. Between
1965 and 1968 she contributed a column on women’s issues for
Hawa (Eve) magazine, and in 1966 she wrote a three-act
play called "Bay’ wa Shira" (Selling and
Buying). This play did not see the light until 1994; al-Zayyat
felt that its theme, love versus possession, was trivial next
to the horrors of the 1967 Arab defeat against Israel.
In
"Hamlat Tafteesh," al-Zayyat wrote that
she felt personally responsible for that defeat. A few days
after the war, during a meeting attended by 50 of Egypt ’s
most prominent writers, she pointed an accusing finger at
her audience and herself: “Each of us is responsible for this
defeat,” she proclaimed. “If we had said “NO” every time a
wrong was done, we would not have been defeated... If all
the intellectuals said no, they would not have been able to
jail us all.”
Overwhelmed
with feelings of anger and guilt, al-Zayyat the artist stopped
writing. “After the 1967 defeat, I hated words and, consequently,
literature. I confined my readings to history and economics,
and I wrote that a single bullet against the enemy was more
significant than all the words in the world...”
New
Beginnings
But for someone who
views life as “a sequence of beginnings and responses to new
beginnings punctuated by struggle ... a continuity akin to
that of breathing,” silence and defeat cannot last for long.
Al-Zayyat
continued her public work. She was head of the Dramatic Criticism
Section in the Higher Institute of the Arts from 1970-1972
and director of the Egyptian Academy of the Arts from 1972-1973.
She was a member of numerous organizations such as the International
Peace Council and the Union of Palestinian Writers. She represented
Egypt at United Nations women’s conferences and in several
organizations including the Union of Arab writers and the
Palestine National Council.
As
a university professor, al-Zayyat was a mentor to a whole
generation of women writers who are now making their mark
on the Egyptian cultural scene. In her relationship with her
students, she was both a rigorous teacher and a warm friend.
In the words of Itidal Uthman, she did not teach “from the
position of paternalism, but from the position of equality.”
She
published nine critical books on Anglo-American literature,
including studies of Hemingway, Hume, Ford Madox Ford, T.S.
Eliot, and D.H. Lawrence . She also published, in Arabic,
"Naguib Mahfouz: the Image and the Ideal" (1989);
"Images of Women in the Arabic Novel" (1989); and
"Lights: Critical Essays" (1994). Her criticism
was influenced by the New Criticism movement in literature
(embraced by her former husband) and by Marxist literary theories.
She helped introduce both movements to Arab readers through
her translation of T. S. Eliot’s "Critical Essays"
in 1962 and "About Art: a Marxist View" in 1995.
One
of al-Zayyat’s most important political activities was forming
and heading the Committee for the Defense of National Culture,
which spearheaded the efforts against the normalization of
cultural relations with Israel. In 1981, along with 1,500
other Egyptians including her brother, al-Zayyat was thrown
in jail by Sadat. There she learned that her house had been
under surveillance for the previous three years. She also
found that prison can be a rich experience, “provided one
manages to discover her inherent human potential, and to hold
to this with all the pride of a human being capable of adapting
to all circumstances and also capable of surmounting all circumstances...
this experience reveals that person’s fundamental nature,
either as clay (lacking in form and will), or alternately
as ceramic revealing the human ability to shape the self and
to create beauty.”
Prison
seems to have rejuvenated al-Zayyat’s creativity. She wrote
her memoirs while incarcerated. Later, she published a collection
of short stories called "al-Shaykhukha wa qisas ukhra"
(Old Age and Other Stories, 1986), the novella "Al-Rajul
al-lathi ‘Arifa Tuhmatuh" (The Man Who Knew His
Charge, 1995), and the novel "Sahib el-Beit"
(The House Owner, 1995 — the English translation of
this book is currently in press). Her autobiography is forthcoming
in French, German, and English translations. But for now,
the only work available by her in English is the short story
“The Picture.”
In
her work, al-Zayyat used a dramatic language that reflects
tensions and contradictions and that is free from cliches.
The theme of liberation from oppression, whether institutional
or personal, is central to all her writing. According to Dr.
Ameena Rasheed, al-Zayyat “does not separate general oppression
from one’s oppression of the self or from others’ oppression
of the defeatist self.”
“I
don’t have any regrets,” al-Zayyat responded when asked to
evaluate her life and achievements. She went on to say: “Perhaps
it would have been possible for me to be a better writer,
or a better fighter, or a better professor if I had confined
myself to one role. But my languages are multiple. And it
is through my use of these many languages that I have enriched
myself and others.”
Many
are grateful for Latifa al-Zayyat for having spoken. Her words
will be remembered.
References
used in this feature include: Akhbar al-Adab (June 28, 1996.
7-13), Al Hayat (September 20, 1996), Ferial J. Ghazoul and
Barbara Harlow, “The View From Within: Writers and Critics
on Contemporary Arabic Literature” (Cairo: The American University
of Cairo Press, 1994. 165-170), Joseph T. Zeidan, “Arab Women
Novelists: The Formative Years and Beyond” (New York: State
University of New York Press, 1995. 246-260). I’m also grateful
to the members of the Adabiyat internet list for their helpful
responses to my questions.
This feature appeared
appeared in Al Jadid, Vol. 2 No. 12 (October 1996)
Copyright © by
Al Jadid (1996)
|